Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2004

New Canadian Merger Guidelines - Implications for Strategic Merger Planning

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

New Canadian Merger Enforcement Guidelines that explain the Competition Bureau’s approach to analysing mergers have just been released. The new MEGs reflect substantial convergence with the U.S. and recently amended European guidelines, including new references to the potential use of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) used in the U.S. in some aspects of merger analysis.

CanadaInternational Law

New Canadian Merger Enforcement Guidelines that explain the Competition Bureau’s approach to analysing mergers have just been released. The new MEGs reflect substantial convergence with the U.S. and recently amended European guidelines, including new references to the potential use of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) used in the U.S. in some aspects of merger analysis. Parties to multi-jurisdictional mergers should benefit from this move toward convergence to the extent that it signals a more consistent analytical approach across jurisdictions. The key changes in the new MEGs are highlighted below:

Less Safety in Safe Harbours.

The new MEGs retain the same safe harbours: (i) unilateral exercise of market power – 35%; and (ii) co-ordinated exercise of market power – four firm concentration ratio of 65% or merged entity share of less than 10%. However, the previous MEGs provided that high market share or concentration is a "necessary condition" to finding that a merger is likely to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from