Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JUNE 2024

Exploring A Generic Aboriginal Right To Economic Development, As Articulated In White And Montour

In Montour, Mohawks of Kahnawa:ke members, White and Montour, were convicted for importing tobacco without paying taxes required under the federal Excise Act.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

In the third article of our firm's four-part series on the landmark decision of the Quebec Superior Court (QCSC) in Montour[1], we explore the significance of the Court's findings of a generic Aboriginal right to pursue economic development.

Montour marks an 'abrupt' departure from Van der Peet

In Montour, Mohawks of Kahnawa:ke members, White and Montour, were convicted for importing tobacco without paying taxes required under the federal Excise Act.2 They argued the Act violated their Aboriginal and treaty rights under the historic Covenant Chain treaty. The QCSC agreed, and in reaching its conclusion, Justice Bourque recognized a collective s. 35(1) Aboriginal right to pursue economic development, and a treaty right to discuss tobacco trade issues with the Crown. The Court held that Canada illegally interfered with these rights and ordered a permanent stay of the charges.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from