Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 DECEMBER 2011

Recent Developments In Section 8 Jurisprudence

In very general terms, section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ("Regulations") provides for liability by an innovator to a generic manufacturer for the generic manufacturer's damages if an application for a prohibition Order is unsuccessful.

CanadaFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

In very general terms, section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations ("Regulations") provides for liability by an innovator to a generic manufacturer for the generic manufacturer's damages if an application for a prohibition Order is unsuccessful. While over 40 section 8 actions have been commenced, only four have been determined on their merits to date: Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al., 2008 FC 1185 rev'd in part 2009 FCA 187, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused [2009] S.C.C.A. No. 347 (alendronate); Apotex Inc. v. Syntex Pharmaceuticals International Ltd. et al., 2009 FC 494 aff'd 2010 FCA 155, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused [2010] S.C.C.A. No. 312 (naproxen sustained-release); Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al., 2010 FC 1264, appeal pending (lovastatin); Apotex Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al., 2010 FC 287 aff'd 2011 FCA 329 (norfloxacin, see below). Two recent decisions, including the appeal decision in norfloxacin, are

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from