Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2015

Will The Mooter Who Promised His Analysis Please Send It?

Dianne was honoured to be a semifinal judge again this year at the Willms and Shier Environmental Law Moot at the Ontario Court of Appeal.

CanadaEnvironment

Dianne was honoured to be a semifinal judge again this year at the Willms and Shier Environmental Law Moot at the Ontario Court of Appeal. The mooters argued the appeal that, in their opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada should have heard from the decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Susan Heyes Inc. (Hazel & Co.) v. South Coast B.C. Transportation Authority, 2011 BCCA 77 (CanLII).

As  we commented in 2011:

"Public works often impose heavy losses on those in private property nearby. Under what circumstances should they be compensated?  That should have been the question in Heyes v. Vancouver, now Susan Heyes Inc. (Hazel & Co.) v. South Coast B.C. Transportation Authority. Alas, it was not – Heyes was decided on whether the transit builders had been at fault."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from