Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MARCH 2014

The Risks Of Gambling With Contaminated Sites

A new case from the Ontario Superior Court provides another example of the risks associated with purchasing contaminated sites.

CanadaEnvironment

A new case from the Ontario Superior Court provides another example of the risks associated with purchasing contaminated sites. In a failed real estate transaction, the potential purchasers were left with substantial costs but did not own the properties they had intended to buy.

In 1828445 Ontario Ltd. v. Guerra, experienced corporate real estate developers began the process of purchasing three adjacent properties, intending to redevelop them as a high rise. They knew that at least one of the properties was contaminated based on the environmental investigation of a nearby property they already owned.

Before the end of the conditional period for the offer to purchase the new properties, their consultant warned them that: the soil was "heavily impacted"; groundwater contamination exceeded Table 3 standards; the contamination might have spread to other neighbouring properties; and there was a risk of liability. The estimated cost of remediation was $1.35 M.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from