Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2016

Tervita Corp. V. Canada (Commissioner Of Competition), 2015 SCC 3

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This Supreme Court of Canada decision provides a measure of certainty to companies that intend to merge.

CanadaEnvironment

Tervita Corp. V. Canada (Commissioner Of Competition), 2015 SCC 3

This Supreme Court of Canada decision provides a measure of certainty to companies that intend to merge. It confirms the proper analytical framework for "prevention" merger reviews under the Competition Act, and the proper approach to the "efficiencies defence" exception.

Tervita Corp. operates two landfills for hazardous waste generated by oil and gas operations in northeastern B.C. In February 2010, Tervita acquired a company that held a permit for another landfill site. The transaction attracted the attention of the Commissioner of Competition, who initiated a merger review process, designed to identify mergers that will have anti-competitive effects. Ultimately, the Competition Tribunal ordered that Tervita divest itself of the acquired company, holding that the merger was likely to prevent competition and that Tervita did not bring itself within the "efficiencies" exception.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from