Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2012

Supreme Court Will Hear Important Appeal: Is Flying Rock A Discharge?

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted Castonguay Blasting leave to appeal its disturbing conviction for failing to report a "discharge", contrary to section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act.

CanadaEnvironment

The Supreme Court of Canada has granted Castonguay Blasting leave to appeal its disturbing  conviction for failing to report a "discharge", contrary to section 15 of the Environmental Protection Act. The "discharge" was an escaped piece of flyrock from blasting, which was reported  to the Ministry of Labour as directed in Castonguay's contract with its client, the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. The flyrock did not cause environmental impacts but did damage a neighbouring home, and might have injured the family that lived there.

This is an important case with broad implications.

For Why the Court of Appeal convicted Castonguay, and for Questions the Supreme Court should ask during the appeal, scroll down.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from