Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 APRIL 2024

Sidestepping Contracts: The Expansion Of Environmental Liability Where The Contractor Is Not Paid

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Cordy Environmental Inc v Obsidian Energy Ltd ("Cordy Environmental") opens the door for contractors to pursue former owners and operators...

CanadaEnvironment

The British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Cordy Environmental Inc v Obsidian Energy Ltd ("Cordy Environmental") opens the door for contractors to pursue former owners and operators of contaminated sites with whom they have no contractual relationship to recover their unpaid fees.1 The mechanism used by the contractor in this case to sidestep the standard fee recovery route was the cost-recovery provisions under British Columbia's Environmental Management Act (the "EMA"). Owners, operators and other parties responsible for contaminants should take note of the potential for this decision to broaden the scope of liability for contaminated sites when an environmental contractor is not paid.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from