Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2023

Secured Creditors And Environmental Liabilities: The Qualex Quagmire Continues

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

The stakes in the appeal from a recent case in Alberta, Qualex-Landmark Towers Inc v 12-10 Capital Corp ("Qualex") are rising with the recent decision of the Court of Appeal of Alberta...

CanadaEnvironment

The stakes in the appeal from a recent case in Alberta, Qualex-Landmark Towers Inc v 12-10 Capital Corp ("Qualex") are rising with the recent decision of the Court of Appeal of Alberta granting leave to intervene to the Canadian Bankers Association [Qualex-Landmark Towers Inc v 12-10 Capital Corp, 2023 ABCA 177]. The Canadian Bankers Association sought leave to intervene on the basis that the decision in Qualex creates significant uncertainty for secured lending, particularly where the borrower may have environmental remediation obligations. Being the first decision to apply the reasoning in Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Ltd, 2019 SCC 5, [2019] 1 SCR 150 ("Redwater") to non-insolvency proceedings between two private parties, the appeal decision will have far-reaching implications for secured creditors. If upheld, it not only could provide a super-priority security interest to a private party holding a contingent claim – in priority to registered mortgages

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from