Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2015

Section 99(2) Of The EPA Is A "New And Powerful Tool" For Compensation For Contaminated Lands — Midwest v. Thordarson

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In its recent decision in Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson the Ontario Court of Appeal comments on a number of significant issues in environmental litigation.

CanadaEnvironment

In its recent decision in Midwest Properties Ltd. v. Thordarson1 the Ontario Court of Appeal comments on a number of significant issues in environmental litigation. This case comment focuses on the Court's findings with respect to a property owner's statutory right of action found in s. 99(2) of the Environmental Protection Act2 and its implications.

Our analysis of Midwest with respect to the calculation of damages can be found here and personal liability for damages, including punitive damages, can be found here.

The Facts

The plaintiff, Midwest, acquired a property in 2007. Before purchasing the land, it commissioned a Phase I environmental report based on a visual inspection of the property. The consultant reported that a Phase II was not required.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from