Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2011

Flying Rock A Discharge?

Is a piece of flying rock really a discharge that must be reported under the Environmental Protection Act to the Spills Action Centre?

CanadaEnvironment

Is a piece of flying rock really a discharge that must be reported under the Environmental Protection Act to the Spills Action Centre? In R. v. Castonguay, a blasting contractor was fined $25,000 plus the victim fine surcharge for failing to report fly rock to the MOE. Now, Chief Justice Winkler has given Castonguay leave to appeal its conviction to the Ontario Court of Appeal.

Justice Winkler stated that it was essential in the public interest for this decision to be reviewed. The prosecutor argued that
the legal issues were not of public importance, as they are limited to blasting companies, and asked the Court to trust the ministry not to prosecute in absurd and inappropriate circumstances. (Is Castonguay itself a counter-example?) They also argued that environmental significance is irrelevant to the obligation to report, relying on their interpretation of R. v. Dow.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from