Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MARCH 2011

Environmental Appeals Have To Be Done Right

The Environmental Review Tribunal has reminded all potential appellants that they MUST correctly file their appeals, if they want their case to be heard.

CanadaEnvironment

The Environmental Review Tribunal has reminded all potential appellants that they MUST correctly file their appeals, if they want their case to be heard. In Waterdown Gardens v MOE, a prolonged dispute between the Ministry and the company resulted in two separate orders suspending their certificate of approval. The company appealed the first suspension. During mediation by the ERT, they reached Minutes of Settlement with the MOE to allow them to reopen. Under the Minutes, the ERT retained jurisdiction, and either side could ask to reopen the mediation.

Unfortunately, the company did not completely comply with the settlement, and the MOE issued a second suspension order. The company, which was self represented, wrote to the MOE protesting that the issue was already before the ERT, and should be resolved there, under the first order. The MOE did not respond to the letter, and the company thought that meant the MOE had agreed to proceed under the first order. Thus, they

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from