Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2020

Does Your Indemnity Agreement Protect You?

On December 6, 2019 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Weyerhaeuser Company Limited v. Ontario (Attorney General).

CanadaEnvironment

On December 6, 2019 the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Weyerhaeuser Company Limited v. Ontario (Attorney General). The Court held that a 1985 indemnity granted by Ontario to Reed Ltd. and Great Lakes Forest Products Limited, and intended to apply to their successors and assigns did not protect Weyerhaeuser, a subsequent owner, from a director's remediation order issued by what is now the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA).

As part of a 1985 settlement of the Grassy Narrows English and Wabigoon river mercury contamination litigation, the government of Ontario agreed to provide Great Lakes an indemnification from further liability related to its pulp and paper mill in Dryden, Ontario. Great Lakes in turn released Ontario from 1979 and 1982 indemnities, given at those times to encourage its acquisition, upgrading and continued operation of the mill.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from