Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2014

Blue Box Arbitration Amended Claim

For those following the Blue Box funding arbitration under the Waste Diversion Act, here is the Amended Municipal Claim.

CanadaEnvironment

For those following the fascinating public/ private culture clash that is the Blue Box funding arbitration under the Waste Diversion Act, here is the Amended Municipal Claim. You will see that paragraphs 70 and 71 have been amended, to plead that the Cost Containment Plan was never a legally enforceable amendment to the Blue Box Program Plan. Instead, the municipalities say, it was merely a policy document, a strategy, with no more legal effect than the Minister's calls for a particular level of waste diversion.

Meanwhile, the Blue Box arbitration hearing has begun. Opening statements have been made on behalf of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (by Dianne Saxe) and on behalf of the City of Toronto (by Glenn Chu). In between bouts of procedural wrangling, the first witness has testified for the municipalities. Derek Stephenson was one of the original inventors of the Blue Box, here in Ontario, and has since helped to develop similar

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from