Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2013

A New Twist On Anti-Wind Litigation: The Charter

Because of the social, environmental, and political importance of reducing carbon emissions and switching to renewable sources of energy, the Environmental Protection Act requires wind opponents to show that a renewable energy project will cause serious harm to human health, or serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment.

CanadaEnvironment

Because of the social, environmental, and political importance of reducing carbon emissions and switching to renewable sources of energy, the Environmental Protection Act requires wind opponents to show that a renewable energy project will cause serious harm to human health, or serious and irreversible harm to plant life, animal life or the natural environment. Every case to date has failed to meet this threshold.

Accordingly, the latest anti-wind tactic is to claim that the threshold itself is unconstitutional, i.e. that they have a right, under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to stop all wind turbines within 2 km of their home, without having to prove the probability of harm. See:  Statement of Claim Nov 14. 2012, Drennan v. K2 Wind.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from