Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 SEPTEMBER 2013

How Not To Evade A Restrictive Covenant

In the recent case of Pet Valu Canada Inc. v. 1381114 Ontario Limited, the Court dealt with a motion by a franchisor, Pet Valu Canada Inc., against a numbered company operating as "Pet Stuff & Supplies" and its principals.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Originally published at www.irvinschein.com

In the recent case of Pet Valu Canada Inc. v. 1381114 Ontario Limited, the Court dealt with a motion by a franchisor, Pet Valu Canada Inc., against a numbered company operating as "Pet Stuff & Supplies" and its principals.  Pet Valu was seeking an injunction stopping the defendants from operating a pet supply store which allegedly breached a non-competition covenant in a franchise agreement.

Robin Martin, as sole officer and director of 1381114 Ontario Limited, entered into a franchise agreement with Pet Valu that contained a restrictive covenant.  Ms. Martin personally operated the Pet Valu franchise store until the franchise agreement was terminated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from