Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2015

Are CCAA Proceedings A Panacea For Assignment Or Novation Without Consent?

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In Barafield, CEG Energy Options Inc. (CEG) entered into contracts to provide natural gas to apartment buildings owned by the respondents (Barafield).

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

A purported assignment of a contract without consent and an alleged novation were ineffective, the BC Court of Appeal recently held in Barafield Realty Ltd. v. Just Energy (B.C.) Limited Partnership, 2015 BCCA 421 [Barafield] in the context of considering Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceedings.

In Barafield, CEG Energy Options Inc. (CEG) entered into contracts to provide natural gas to apartment buildings owned by the respondents (Barafield). The contracts were for a fixed five-year term at a fixed rate. During this period, CEG entered into bankruptcy and CCAA proceedings. The contracts were sold to the appellants (Just Energy) and approved by an Alberta CCAA court (the Vesting Order). Barafield had no notice of these proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from