In Badesha v. Cronos
Group, 2021 ONSC 4346, the court refused to certify an
action alleging securities misrepresentation because there was no
reasonable possibility that the alleged misrepresentations caused
any loss. The plaintiff argued that thousands of alleged
misrepresentations in the defendant's financial statements
should be treated as separate misrepresentations, but failed to
establish—or even plead—that anyone relied on any one
of them.
Many securities misrepresentation certification decisions focus
on the predominance of individual issues (see our recent post on 0116064 B.C. Ltd. v. Alio Gold
Inc., 2021 BCSC 540). Cronos Group is a reminder
that a misrepresentation is not enough to clear the hurdle of a
reasonable cause of action required for certification: someone must
have allegedly relied on the misrepresentation. Negligence in the
air is not enough to certify a class action.