Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2025

Clearing The Smoke: Ambiguous Marijuana Exclusions In Insurance Policies

In Busato case (2025 BCCA 79), the British Columbia Court of Appeal considered the applicability of an exclusion clause in a homeowner's insurance policy concerning marijuana cultivation.

CanadaCannabis & Hemp

In Busato case (2025 BCCA 79), the British Columbia Court of Appeal considered the applicability of an exclusion clause in a homeowner's insurance policy concerning marijuana cultivation. The case centered on whether coverage for a total loss fire claim could be denied based on the exclusion's wording and its application to legal, licensed medical marijuana cultivation.

Background

The Appellant, a licensed medical marijuana user, suffered from chronic pain following multiple surgeries between 2006 and 2013. In June 2013, he obtained a Health Canada license permitting him to cultivate up to 73 marijuana plants for personal medical use. This license was renewed and remained active "until the court orders otherwise".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from