Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2012

No Proof Of Malice, No Bad Faith

The Sofia City Court (SCC) has recently issued a decision stating that the Bulgarian producer and importer of canned fruit and vegetables Misota did not act in bad faith when filing the trademark application MIRELA (combined application No. 91118; November 9, 2006).

BulgariaIntellectual Property
Valeri Penev
Valeri Penev

The Sofia City Court (SCC) has recently issued a decision stating that the Bulgarian producer and importer of canned fruit and vegetables Misota did not act in bad faith when filing the trademark application MIRELA (combined application No. 91118; November 9, 2006). The SCC decision entered into force on May 16, 2012.

The SCC rejected the action filed by Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft KG, doing business as the Tengelmann Group, on the grounds of Article 26, Paragraph 3, item 4 of the Bulgarian Law on Marks and Geographical Indications (LMGI).

The plaintiff, a German-based multi-sector retailer present in much of Europe, is the owner of the international registration (IR) MIRELLA (No. 849083; word mark), registered for goods in IC 32, namely fruit syrups for making beverages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from