Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2016

Which Trumps: Creditor Protection Or Choice Of Forum?

Divergence between England & Wales and the British Virgin Islands in the Treatment of Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses in Insolvency Proceedings

British Virgin IslandsWealth Management

Divergence between England & Wales and the British Virgin Islands in the Treatment of Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses in Insolvency Proceedings

Introduction

Any insolvency lawyer in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) or in England & Wales (“E&W”) will tell you that the most common ground for seeking to set aside a statutory demand, or opposing the appointment of a liquidator, is an allegation that the debt is disputed.  They will also tell you that the test is whether the Court is satisfied that the debt is disputed on substantial and bona fide grounds.  The concept of a substantial and bona fide dispute is so entrenched in the authorities that it seems uncontroversial.  Yet the Court of Appeal in each jurisdiction has come to a strikingly different conclusion about what it really means when there is a jurisdiction or arbitration clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from