Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2008

Pre-Emptive Strikes To Freeze Assets

Since the early 1970's, Courts in the British Commonwealth have moved to respond to the dishonest dealer who may, if given the opportunity to do so, seek to avoid his obligations by concealing evidence, dissipating or transferring assets, and resorting to delaying tactics.

British Virgin IslandsWealth Management

Freezing Orders/Mareva Injunctions.

Since the early 1970's, Courts in the British Commonwealth have moved to respond to the dishonest dealer who may, if given the opportunity to do so, seek to avoid his obligations by concealing evidence, dissipating or transferring assets, and resorting to delaying tactics. The dramatic creation of the ex parte Mareva injunction and the Anton Piller order represent two of the most important accomplishments of modern English legal reform. These extraordinary remedies put the victim of financial crime in a position of obtaining meaningful pre-emptive and pre-judgment asset freezing and evidence search and seizure relief. They are, however, very special. They can and have been abused.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from