Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2012

Enforcing Orders Made In Foreign Insolvency Proceedings

Investors and corporate entities choose jurisdictions with knowledge that they have mature insolvency regimes that will apply in the event of insolvency.

British Virgin IslandsInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This article sets out the potential impact in the BVI and Cayman of the much anticipated Supreme Court decision in Rubin v. Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, which was handed down on 24 October 2012. Rubin deals with the issue of whether orders made in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in the United States can be enforced as judgments of the English Courts.

COMPETING SETS OF RULES AND PRINCIPLES

There are two sets of legal rules, each developed with very different aims in mind, which might provide the answer to this issue. First, the well-established conflict of laws rules applicable to the enforcement of foreign judgments. Secondly, the rules and principles of cross-border insolvency. Broadly speaking, the first set of rules is aimed at keeping a sovereign nation's law and authority within its proper bounds. The second set of rules is aimed at achieving a single insolvency in the place of the debtor's main domicile and encouraging the co-operation of other

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from