Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2026

From Characterisation To Enforcement: Navigating Antibody Patents In Brazil

Licks Attorneys
Licks Attorneys
Contributor
Licks Attorneys

Licks Attorneys

Licks Attorneys is one of Brazil’s most respected litigation law firms, having unparalleled...

View firm profile
Explore more from Licks Attorneys

Senior legal practitioners explain how antibody characterisation during patent prosecution can shape patent scope, validity, and enforcement in Brazil, drawing lessons from the landmark US Supreme Court decision in Amgen v Sanofi and examining the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office's emphasis on structural definition in antibody claims.

BrazilIntellectual Property

Senior legal practitioners of Licks Attorneys explain how antibody characterisation during prosecution can shape patent scope, validity, and enforcement in Brazil, with lessons from the US Amgen v Sanofi decision

Patent disputes involving antibodies in Brazil are not abundant, but experience shows that decisions made during prosecution can significantly influence how courts will rule on enforcement and validity assessment.

Although the need to characterise an antibody is not unique to Brazil, the level and form of characterisation required may vary across jurisdictions. The Brazilian patent and trademark office’s (BPTO’s) practice places particular emphasis on the structural definition of the antibody in the claims. This may affect the scope of protection ultimately obtained, the patent’s ability to withstand validity challenges, and how broadly the claims may be enforced against competing products.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from