Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 OCTOBER 2010

Akzo Nobel Chemicals v Commission

The Court of Justice of the European Union (the "Court") on 14 September 2010 handed down a landmark judgment in an appeal brought by Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd.

BelgiumInternational Law
Mark Powell
Mark Powell
Genevra Forwood
Genevra Forwood
Stefan Mahoney
Stefan Mahoney

Long-running battle ends in denial of legal privilege for in-house lawyers

The Court of Justice of the European Union (the "Court") on 14 September 2010 handed down a landmark judgment in an appeal brought by Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Akcros Chemicals Ltd. The Court dismissed the appeal in its entirety, denying the application of legal professional privilege ("LPP") to communications between company representatives and their in-house lawyers in the context of EU competition investigations.

The judgment of the Court comes as no surprise since it follows the opinion of Advocate General Kokott and the judgment of the General Court. It draws a distinction between in-house lawyers, who are deemed not to be sufficiently independent from clients to benefit from LPP, and external lawyers, whose communications with clients remain protected by privilege. The effect of this is that any communications between salaried in-house lawyers and their employers will not be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from