Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2016

Same-same, only different – key differences in law and practice affecting private share deals in Australia and China

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

There are key differences in law and practice between Australia and mainland China in relation to private share deals.

AustraliaInternational Law

In 2014, mainland China's investment in Australia totalled $64.5 billion and Australia's investment in mainland China reached almost $58 billion. Australia maintained its position as the second largest recipient country of aggregated global mainland Chinese direct investment between 2007 and 2014, behind the United States in first position. And in 2014, mainland China was Australia's 6th leading investment destination country behind the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Japan, and Germany. In this context, there has been a substantial amount of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity between Australia and China, not to mention the activity that has been channelled through investment vehicles in jurisdictions such as Singapore and Hong Kong.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from