Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2007

TMC Bulletin: 2006 The Year In Review

DLA Piper Australia
Explore more from DLA Piper Australia

The Trade Marks Amendment Act 2006 significantly amends the Trade Marks Act 1995 as set out below. The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2006 makes some additional amendments to the Act.

AustraliaIntellectual Property
Andrew Chalet
Andrew Chalet
Anthony James Conaghan
Anthony James Conaghan

The Trade Marks Amendment Act 2006 significantly amends the Trade Marks Act 1995 as set out below. The Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Act 2006 makes some additional amendments to the Act.

The amendments have either already come into effect or will do so early next year.

Trade mark ownership and dealings

The Act previously provided that an owner of a registered trade mark could deal with that trade mark subject to any rights vested in another person. The Act now provides that the power of a registered owner of a trade mark to deal with the trade mark is limited only by any rights appearing in the Trade Marks register. The amendment brings the Act into line with the Patents Act 1990 and Designs Act 2005.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Counterfeit Imports – Tougher Penalties At The Border

Australia strengthens its response to counterfeit goods importation through new legislation that creates strict liability offences and enables infringement notices at the border. The amendments aim to make counterfeit importing unprofitable by ensuring penalties and seized goods exceed potential profits. How will these changes impact intellectual property rights holders and importers operating in Australia?
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Pointon Partners
Pointon Partners
Article

Supporting ‘Human Artistry’: Wholly AI-Generated Recordings Disqualified From ARIA Charts In Australia

The Australian Recording Industry Association has amended its chart eligibility guidelines to exclude songs predominantly created by generative AI, sparking debate about the intersection of artificial intelligence and copyright law. This decision mirrors broader legal challenges facing courts and regulators worldwide as they grapple with determining when AI-generated or AI-assisted works deserve copyright protection and recognition.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Article

How Can You Retain Intellectual Property When A Client Will Not Pay?

A service provider who has not assigned their intellectual property still owns it, regardless of what the invoice says. Under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the creator owns copyright by default, and ownership moves only by written assignment. Paying a designer or developer does not transfer ownership on its own. That default gives service providers real leverage where a client refuses to pay. Retention and suspension clauses turn the default into a contractual right to withhold deliverables.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
LegalVision
LegalVision
Article

Protecting The AI Systems Competitors Can Actually Copy

Businesses building AI products on third-party models face a critical intellectual property challenge: determining what parts of their AI systems can actually be protected when competitors have access to the same underlying models. This analysis explores where protectable value sits in AI workflows, from data retrieval and validation processes to system integration and deployment architecture, and why patent strategy must focus on the commercially defensible elements rather than just the AI model itself.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers