Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 FEBRUARY 2009

Double Insurance And The Right Of Subrogation

The landmark case of Speno Rail Maintenance Australia Pty Ltd v Metals & Minerals Insurance Pte Ltd & Ors [2009] WASCA 91 may limit an insurer's ability to recover money paid out for a claim where another insurer is also potentially liable to contribute under the principle of double insurance.

AustraliaInsurance

The landmark case of Speno Rail Maintenance Australia Pty Ltd v Metals & Minerals Insurance Pte Ltd & Ors [2009] WASCA 91 may limit an insurer's ability to recover money paid out for a claim where another insurer is also potentially liable to contribute under the principle of double insurance.

The decision shows that carefully worded 'other insurance' clauses are not voided by the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) and can be used by insurers to avoid double insurance claims. It also highlights that insurers may need to consider measures that encourage their insureds to make a claim for indemnity under their policy first (even if another insurance policy providing cover has a lower deductible) to avoid the loss of a right of subrogation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from