Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2008

Will your wishes be upheld?

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

The recent Queensland Supreme Court case of Underwood v Underwood [2008] QSC 159 was decided in July this year.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

The recent Queensland Supreme Court case of Underwood v Underwood [2008] QSC 159 was decided in July this year.

The Facts

  • Peter Charles Underwood died in May 2006 aged 64. His estate had approximately $1,300,000 in business assets and around $1,000,000 of other assets.
  • He left $213,000 on trust for his daughter Peta, who was 29, had special needs resulting from a drug addiction and lived with her mother.
  • He left his sons Derek and Scott $250,000 each, which included a small share of the business. Neither Derek nor Scott had any particular needs. They were both employed and had a reasonable amount of assets. Neither were involved in Peter's business.
  • He left his de facto partner Annette shares valued at $76,000 and paintings. She also received $200,000 from a Workcover payment resulting from his death.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from