Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2018

Contesting wills - Insight from Power v Smart (2018) WASC 168

The case demonstrates the type of evidence required to contest a will and the high threshold needed in order to succeed.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

In Power v Smart (2018) WASC 168, the daughters of the late Mrs Okle, who had dementia and severely impaired vision and hearing, unsuccessfully disputed the validity of their late mother's will. The case demonstrates the type of evidence required to contest a will and the high threshold which must be met in order to succeed.

Factual background

Irene Okle passed away in August 2013 at the age of 93, leaving behind two children, five grandchildren and eight great grandchildren. Two years earlier Mrs Okle had executed a will while she was a resident at an aged care facility (the 2011 Will).

The 2011 Will appointed two of her grandchildren as the executors (Robyn and Michael), and left her entire estate to her 8 great grandchildren. In 2016 Robyn and Michael commenced proceedings in the Supreme Court to formally pronounce the force and validity of the 2011 Will.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from