Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2021

Government cannot ignore impact of climate change on children when approving coal mine expansion

The government has a duty of care to consider the impact of climate change on children before making environment-related decisions.

AustraliaEnvironment

In what has been hailed as a worldwide landmark judgement, in May 2021 the Federal Court found the government has a duty of care to consider the impact of climate change on children before making environment-related decisions.

The unusual case was brought by eight teenagers, aged 13 to 17, and an 86-year-old nun acting as their litigation guardian. Together, they initiated a class action suit against Whitehaven Coal, which is seeking to expand its Vickery coal mine near Gunnedah in northern NSW. (See Sharma by her litigation representative Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560.)

The youngsters, through their lawyers, argued that Environment Minister Sussan Ley had a duty under common law to protect young people from future harm that is a result of climate change; harm that will be exacerbated if the coal mine expansion goes ahead.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from