Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2012

Rectification: How to prove your "contract" is not your contract

A look at some of the key principles that apply in rectification cases, and defences that can defeat such a case.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Points:

Whether you're making or defending a rectification claim, it's important to be aware of what evidence is admissible and what defences might apply (and how you can use them to your advantage).

In our last article on rectification, we outlined the requirements for rectification and gave some practical tips for those seeking to rectify a written contract that does not reflect what they intended.

In this follow-up article, we look at some of the key evidentiary principles that apply in rectification cases, and defences and discretionary factors that can defeat such a case.

Obtain evidence of the parties' subjective and objective intention

Rectification is a discretionary remedy and will only be granted if the Court is satisfied, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parties held the necessary intention at the time of executing the document (and were not then aware that the document failed to record that intention).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from