Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2012

Misleading Representations. A warning for franchisors

A successful appeal by franchisees against a franchisor has highlighted certain risks to franchisors.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

As a franchisor it is one thing to ensure that the information you provide in your Disclosure Document is accurate; but it's another to ensure that what you and your staff say in an effort to attract prospective franchisees does not in any way induce a prospective franchisee to enter into a franchise agreement especially when there are no reasonable grounds for saying what is said.

A successful appeal by franchisees against franchisor Billy Baxters (Franchising) Pty Ltd in the Victorian Supreme Court of Appeal has highlighted the risks to franchisors when negotiating and promoting Greenfield sites to prospective franchisees.

Judgement in the Victorian Supreme Court

The original judgement1 found in favour of the franchisor. Representations made by the franchisor's representative, Mr Mauviel, regarding the expected revenue to be had by the franchisee if they were to establish a brand new Billy Baxters restaurant at the Greenfield site at Glenelg were held not to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from