Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2012

Limitation Period: Extension upheld

It is not required for a plaintiff to take "appropriate advice" if in this instance it would not be reasonable to do so.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law
Joseph Vermiglio
Joseph Vermiglio

Judgment date: 17 April 2012

Suncorp Metway Insurance Limited v Norris [2012] QCA 101

Supreme Court of Queensland1

In Brief

  • Reasonableness of the plaintiff seeking medical attention and exposing the true extent of the injury beyond the limitation period depends on the warning signs experienced by the plaintiff.
  • The fact that a previously unidentified vehicle at fault becomes known by police at a later date will not automatically preclude the plaintiff from an extension to the limitation period. Reasonableness in the circumstances of each case remains the ultimate determination.

Background

On 29 March 2005, the respondent was injured in a motor vehicle accident when the front of her vehicle was struck by a box containing a radiator that fell off the back of the vehicle travelling ahead. The impact of the box caused the respondent to lose control of her vehicle and strike concrete barriers to her right.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from