Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2017

Indemnity clauses: a cautionary tale for businesses

Businesses should ensure that agreements, and in particular indemnity clauses, are drafted in unambiguous terms.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

The recent NSW Court of Appeal Decision, CSR Limited v Adecco (Australia) Pty Ltd, illustrates the risks of an ambiguously drafted indemnity clause, as well as the circumstances in which a Court may determine if an indemnity clause continues to operate after the formal expiration of a fixed term contract.

Background

On 1 April 2000, Adecco provided labour hire services to CSR Limited & Holcim (Australia) (CSR). The services were provided on a two year fixed term contract (the Agreement) which was to expire on 31 March 2002 but was mutually extended until 31 July 2002.

The Agreement contained the following indemnity clause:

23.2. Any loss of or damage to property of CSR, real or personal caused or contributed to by the Supplier or its employees, agents, sub-contractors or Temporary Staff.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from