Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2009

Director´s Retirement Benefit Held To Be Valid

In Dome Resources NL v Silver [2008] NSWCA 322, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered this limitation in the context of a challenge to the validity of a retirement deed, which it held to be valid and effective.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

In brief

  • A director arranged for his services to be made available through a company, and requested that payment be made to it.
  • The court accepted that the payment had been made available, indirectly, to the director as remuneration, for the purpose of calculating the maximum retirement benefit that could be paid to the director.

The Corporations Act 2001 limits the amount that companies may pay a director in connection with their retirement, without shareholder approval. In Dome Resources NL v Silver [2008] NSWCA 322, the New South Wales Court of Appeal considered this limitation in the context of a challenge to the validity of a retirement deed, which it held to be valid and effective.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from