Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2011

Colonial First State Investments decision illustrates difficulty in a unit trust qualifying as a fixed trust

Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward
Contributor
Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward

Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cooper Grace Ward

The recent Federal Court decision of Colonial First State Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 16 further highlights the danger of assuming that unit trusts will qualify as "fixed" trusts.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

The recent Federal Court decision of Colonial First State Investments Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 16 further highlights the danger of assuming that unit trusts will qualify as "fixed" trusts.

In Colonial, the court found that a large unit trust managed by Colonial First State was not a fixed trust because the trust deed allowed the trust deed to be amended with the approval of a special resolution (in this case 75% of unit holders).

The court effectively decided that, if a unit holder's interest could be reduced or detrimentally affected as a result of a special resolution of unit holders or other actions of the trustee, the unit holder did not have a "vested and indefeasible interest" as required by section 272-5 (schedule 2F- 1936 Tax Act).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from