Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 APRIL 2009

Retention Of Title Clauses

Retention of title (ROT) clauses or “Romalpa” clauses have become commonplace in contracts for the supply of goods.

AustraliaAntitrust/Competition Law
William Esau
William Esau

Are your goods safe?

Retention of title (ROT) clauses or "Romalpa"1 clauses have become commonplace in contracts for the supply of goods.

ROT clauses provide that the property in goods sold does not pass until the buyer has paid the price for those goods. For example, a successful ROT clause will mean that the buyer of goods does not necessarily own the products until it has paid for them, even if he holds possession of the product.

The purpose of such clauses is to protect the unpaid seller from the insolvency of the buyer and defeat the claims of other creditors who hold registered charges over the buyer's assets.

A simple ROT clause retains ownership of goods in the seller until payment is made for those particular goods. By careful wording, the protection afford by a ROT clause can be extended to address the following circumstances:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from