Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2014

Is the access regime worth keeping? The Productivity Commission says 'yes’

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The Report into the effectiveness of the access regime in Part IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act was released.

AustraliaAntitrust/Competition Law

On 11 February 2014, the Productivity Commission (PC) released its report ("Final Report")1 into the effectiveness of the national access regime in Part IIIA of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Regime). The Final Report was the outcome of an inquiry ordered by the Federal Government in October 2012.

By way of background, the Regime allows third parties to seek regulated access to certain services provided by nationally significant infrastructure and has been subject to extensive criticism as a result of the cost and delay associated with a number of third party attempts to gain access to services. One striking example is Fortescue's unsuccessful attempt, over the course of nine years, to gain access to iron-ore railways owned by BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto in the Pilbara.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from