Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2008

Franchisor Consent To Transfer Of A Franchise

In Lockhart v Holden [2008] QSC 257, Justice Douglas of the Supreme Court of Queensland handed down a judgment where the franchisee challenged the franchisor's refusal to consent to a transfer of its franchise to a third party buyer.

AustraliaAntitrust/Competition Law
Fred Potgieter
Fred Potgieter

In Lockhart v Holden [2008] QSC 257, Justice Douglas of the Supreme Court of Queensland handed down a judgment where the franchisee challenged the franchisor's refusal to consent to a transfer of its franchise to a third party buyer.

Section 20(2) of the Franchising Code of Conduct (Code) provides that a franchisor must not unreasonably withhold a consent to the transfer of a franchise. In turn, section 20(3)(a) to (h) provides a non-exhaustive list of circumstances in which it is reasonable for a franchisor to withhold consent, including:

  1. 'The proposed transferee has not met the selection criteria of the franchisor.
  2. Agreement to the transfer will have a significantly adverse effect on the franchise system.'

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from