Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2009

Coordinated effects in mergers and acquisitions – Considering the implications of cross directorships

Is your company contemplating a merger or increasing its shareholding in a competitor? Is it embarking on a joint venture with a competitor? Is there talk of acquiring an interest in an entity that operates upstream or downstream to your business operations? If a member of your board also sits on the board of a competitor, or a substitute or complementary company, an assessment of the implications of cross directorships and the resulting coordinated effects are integral in the initial stages of

AustraliaAntitrust/Competition Law

Is your company contemplating a merger or increasing its shareholding in a competitor? Is it embarking on a joint venture with a competitor? Is there talk of acquiring an interest in an entity that operates upstream or downstream to your business operations? If a member of your board also sits on the board of a competitor, or a substitute or complementary company, an assessment of the implications of cross directorships and the resulting coordinated effects are integral in the initial stages of any proposed deal.

M&A – the legislative and ACCC approach

Section 50(3) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (TPA) provides a non-exhaustive list of matters to be taken into account when assessing whether a merger or acquisition would be likely to substantially lessen competition in a market. The ACCC Merger guidelines 2008 (Guidelines) specify, in addition to the legislated list, other factors relevant to the ACCC's assessment of a proposed merger.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from