Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2004

Things Go Better With Coke

This article reports on two significant recent developments. The lead story centers on a national appellate court decision holding (we think unfairly) a regional Coca Cola bottler jointly liable for labor claims made against a distributor. Our second story, <B>Shocked Back to Life?</B>, offers some encouraging news to bondholders pursuing claims in bankruptcy.

ArgentinaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Ines Maguire
Ines Maguire
Mariela Caparrós
Mariela Caparrós

This article reports on two significant recent developments. The lead story centers on a national appellate court decision holding (we think unfairly) a regional Coca Cola bottler jointly liable for labor claims made against a distributor. Our second story, Shocked Back to Life?, offers some encouraging news to bondholders pursuing claims in bankruptcy.

In a decision that has left the mouths of attorneys agape, the National Labor Appeals Court has held a Coca Cola bottler jointly liable for labor claims brought by an employee of one of the bottler’s distributors. In Andrada v. O’Mari S.A.,1 the appellate court determined that Coca Cola Femsa de Buenos Aires S.A. ("Femsa"), a Coca Cola bottler serving the Buenos Aires metropolitan region, was jointly liable for work-related injuries suffered by the plaintiff. The court based its ruling on Section 30 of the Employment Agreement Act.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from