Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2026

Is Your HR Technology About To Become A High-Risk AI System?

Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Explore more from Seyfarth Shaw LLP

As artificial intelligence transforms workplace operations from recruiting to performance management, organizations face mounting regulatory scrutiny over high-risk AI applications under frameworks like the EU AI Act.

AfghanistanEmployment and HR
Yana Komsitsky
Yana Komsitsky
Paul Whinder
Paul Whinder
Georgia Hill Smith
Georgia Hill Smith
Author LinkedIn connections

Artificial intelligence enabled tools are rapidly taking over recruiting, hiring, workforce planning, performance management, and employee monitoring tools. In a recent Westlaw Today article, Yana Komsitsky, Paul Whinder, and Georgia Hill Smith discuss which types of workplace applications are likely to be classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act and what employers should be doing now to prepare. Their practical roadmap addresses governance, vendor oversight, workforce impacts, and global compliance strategies for organizations navigating an increasingly complex AI/automated decision-making regulatory environment.

Why This Matters

  • Some AI tools that influence employment-related decisions may face more heightened regulatory scrutiny than others, but the assessment may vary under different frameworks.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Update On The EU Forced Labour Regulation: What The European Commission’s New Guidelines Mean For Companies

The EU Forced Labour Regulation establishes comprehensive requirements for all companies operating in the EU market, regardless of size or sector, to ensure their products and supply chains are free from forced labour. New guidelines provide practical implementation measures that will shape enforcement practices when the regulation takes effect in December 2027.
European UnionEmployment and HR
Littler - Canada
Littler - Canada
Article

EU Pay Transparency: Lessons For Employers From First Three Member States’ Legislation

Three EU Member States—Italy, Lithuania, and Slovakia—have enacted legislation transposing the EU Pay Transparency Directive, revealing both common compliance threads and country-specific variations that multinational employers must navigate. These early implementations establish enforceable pay transparency obligations, from recruitment disclosures to employee information requests and gender pay gap reporting.
European UnionEmployment and HR
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Article

EU Pay Transparency Directive: Practical Briefing For International Employers

The EU Pay Transparency Directive's transposition deadline has passed with most Member States failing to implement national legislation, creating a fragmented legal landscape that exposes employers to immediate compliance risks. Despite delayed national implementation, the Directive's underlying obligations are already shaping legal exposure through direct effect and directive-consistent interpretation. Employers face complex requirements spanning pre-employment salary disclosure, in-employment transparency
GlobalEmployment and HR
Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Article

A New Price Tag On OPT? DHS Proposes Unprecedented Fees For F-1 Practical Training

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed imposing fees of $70,000 for initial OPT recommendations and $30,000 for second-year extensions on educational institutions, potentially reshaping how international students, universities, and employers participate in the Optional Practical Training program. While framed as a fraud prevention measure, the proposal raises critical questions about workforce access, cost allocation...
United StatesImmigration
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article

DHS Allows Salvadoran TPS Beneficiaries To Work And Remain, For Now

The Department of Homeland Security has confirmed that Salvadoran Temporary Protected Status beneficiaries remain protected despite the September 9, 2026 expiration date, though no formal announcement has been made regarding the program's future. This development raises critical questions about employer obligations and the potential scenarios that may unfold, including termination with a 60-day notice period or an extension of the designation.
United StatesImmigration
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article

More Than A Download: Using USCIS’s E-Verify Records Disposal Deadline As A Compliance Checkup

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is permanently disposing of E-Verify records last updated before December 31, 2016, giving employers until January 8, 2027, to download critical compliance documentation. Companies must act now to preserve historical case data needed for audits, government investigations, and Form I-9 system transitions while ensuring their E-Verify account information remains current and accurate.
United StatesImmigration
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article

Replay Review: California Resets The Clock And Rewrites AB 692 Playbook

California's Legislature has significantly amended AB 692, the state's aggressive "stay-or-pay" law, delaying enforcement until 2027 and creating new exceptions for financial services and retention incentives. Employers now have additional time to restructure agreements, but must navigate revised requirements for training repayment, sign-on bonuses, and other arrangements that could require workers to repay money upon leaving employment.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Article

California Contractors Get A Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens The Harsh Consequences Of Contractor License Lapses

Imagine completing a multimillion-dollar project, performing quality work, paying your subcontractors, and satisfying the owner, only to discover that a temporary contractor license lapse could prevent you from recovering payment for that work or pursuing claims for extra work. For decades, that was the reality under California Business and Professions Code section 7031.
United StatesReal Estate and Construction
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Seyfarth Shaw LLP