Show options

England

Barristers

Thomas Harvey

Thomas Harvey

1 Hare Court, London

Position

Tom’s practice is focused on complex financial remedy work. He is regularly instructed as junior counsel to the leading silks in cases concerning ultra-high net worth individuals and/or and complex issues. He is also frequently instructed as sole counsel in cases before High Court judges.

His cases frequently involve:

  • Disputes as to the proper treatment of non-matrimonial / matrimonialised assets
  • Contested jurisdiction
  • High net worth individuals
  • Offshore and corporate/trust structures
  • Disputed valuation evidence
  • Allegations of non-disclosure
  • Issues of privilege

Tom is increasingly instructed to sit as an early neutral evaluator.

Notable cases:

  • Standish v Standish [2024] EWCA Civ 567 – Landmark case on the proper treatment of assets generated outside of the marital partnership. Successfully reduced the appellant wife’s sharing award by £20m.
  • H v GH [2023] EWFC 235 – Successful strike out application of an application to extend time for payment of a lump sum.
  • SBX v ABX [2022] EWHC 3652 (Fam) – Post-Brexit jurisdiction battle between England and Germany.
  • ARQ v YAQ [2022] EWFC 128; [2022] 4 WLR 112 – A leading case on ‘matrimonialisation’ of non-matrimonial assets. Decision of Court of Appeal awaited.
  • Baker v Baker [2023] EWFC 136 – Implementing a New York Separation Agreement before the English Court.
  • Baker v Baker [2022] EWFC 15; [2022] 2 FCR 555 – Impact of unsatisfactory disclosure on an application for interim maintenance.
  • G v T [2023] EWFC 235– Post-separation endeavour, disputed valuation evidence.
  • Haskell v Haskell [2019] EWHC 3434 (Fam); [2020] 4 WLR 24; [2020] 1 FCR 565 – Interim maintenance order suspended rather than dismissed.
  • FW v FH [2019] EWHC 1338 (Fam); [2019] 2 FCR 937 – Extraction of value from a family business.
  • Hammoud v Al Zawiwi [2019] EWHC 697 (Fam); [2019] 3 FCR 356 – Prison sentence imposed on the husband who had breached an order to provide financial disclosure in proceedings under Part III of the MFPA 1984.
  • Hammoud v Al Zawiwi [2019] EWHC 736 (Fam); [2019] 3 FCR 356 – Absence of affidavit evidence in committal applications.
  • Chai v Peng (Jurisdiction: Forum Conveniens) (No2) [2014] EWHC 3518 (Fam); [2015] 2 FLR 424; [2015] Fam. Law 37 – Jurisdiction race between Malaysia and England, with assets of over £200m.
  • Chai v Peng (Estoppel: Foreign Judgment) (No1) [2014] EWHC 3519 (Fam); [2015] 2 FLR 412; [2015] Fam. Law 37 – Rebutted the husband’s case that the wife should be prevented from pursuing her jurisdiction claim before the English court.

Publications:

  • Co-author of chapter on pre/post nuptial agreements in the current edition of Rayden and Jackson on Relationship Breakdown, Finances and Children

Career

Called 2013

Memberships

  • National Executive Committee of the Family Law Bar Association
  • Affiliate Member of Resolution
  • Inner Temple

Education

  • Redruth School
  • Keble College, University of Oxford (Philosophy, Politics and Economics)
  • Oxford Brookes University (GDL)
  • Kaplan Law School (BPTC)

Personal

Prior to coming to the Bar, Tom spent three years as a full-time athlete training out of the GB Rowing High Performance Centre at Leander Club, Henley-on-Thames.

Mentions

Content supplied by 1 Hare Court