Scotland

The New Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chambers of the First-tier Tribunal (IAC) was published on 1 November 2024. It replaces the previous practice Directions of 13 May 2022 and supersedes Practice Statement No 1 of 2022 dated 13 May 2022.  The issues-based approach and procedural rigour of the new Practice Direction Under guiding principles Part 1 of the Practice Direction, it is stated that “the overriding objective to the Tribunal is that cases are dealt with fairly and justly”. Its aim “allowing appropriate resources, both of the Tribunal and the parties, to be allocated in proportion to the nature and extent of the issues in dispute; avoid unnecessary delay and ensure that both parties can fairly present evidence and submissions. The Practice Direction applies to appellants without representatives in the same way as it does to parties represented by lawyers.  It does not apply to applications of Immigration Bail. Bundles, Appeal Skeleton Arguments (ASAs) and Respondent’s Review Significant new rules on bundles emphasises conciseness, specifying that the Appeal Skeleton Argument should be no more than 12 pages of numbered paragraphs and the text must be “in no less than size 12 font with 1.5 line spacing” and expert reports should be no more than 20 pages, although it is possible to apply for permission to exceed these limits.  The Practice Direction makes clear that the appellant may be directed to provide an ASA or an explanation of their case and evidence (not represented appellants), even if the Respondent fails to provide a bundle. Any bundle that is prepared by a legal representative must be in a digital, indexed, bookmarked and paginated format where every page is A4. Any evidence submitted after the Respondent’s Review, must be prepared as a bundle and accompanied by “a written explanation of why it was not provided earlier in the appeal process”. Parties relying on material within country guidance decisions or additional country background information must include a country information evidence schedule (‘the country schedule’) within the bundle. The country schedule must: contain the country guidance paragraph references and/or extracts of additional country information relied upon by reference to each disputed issue; not exceed 12 pages; and include the relevant hyper-link to the additional country background information source document. Witness statements In relation to witness statements, a witness statement must be in the intended witness own words and it need not be in the language that the witness understands.  If it is drafted in English and this is not a language understood by the witness it must include a signed and date attestation by both the witness and the person who interprets, stating that the statement has been read back to the witness in the language they understand and that it accurately reflects their evidence. This statement should be included in bundles and should be capable of standing as the totality of the evidence in chief of the person giving that statement.  It may be added to the provision of a supplementary statement provided that the supplementary statement is produced and served in accordance with any directions given in the appeal.  Only where there is a good reason and with permission of the judge will a witness be permitted to provide additional evidence in chief. The witness statement should be expressed in the first person and should also state the full name of the witness, their place of residence and if they are making the statement in their professional business or other occupational capacity the address at which they work, the position they hold and the name of the firm or employer.  They must state that they are party to the proceedings or they are the employees or relative or such party and the process by which it has been prepared, for example face to face, over the phone, or through an interpreter. The statement should have the date it was signed and must include a statement that it was made from the witness’ own knowledge and which matters of information or belief and the source for any matters, information or belief.  An exhibit or document that is referred to within the witness statement should be verified and clearly identified by the witness and should remain separate from the witness statement.  Where a witness refers to an exhibit or document, they should refer to a description of the document at page X. The status of documents, skeletons and bundles prepared and submitted prior to 1 November 2024 seems unclear.  If documents already submitted to the Tribunal are non-compliant, presumably the judge will accept the lack of notice and additional resources required to comply with requirements. Adjournments An application for an adjournment of an appeal must be supported by full reasons and any reasonably available supporting material or evidence made no later than 4.30pm one clear working day before the date of the hearing.  It must be accompanied by proposed draft directions for the judge to consider.  An application made later than the end of the period mentioned above must be made at the hearing and will, save in exceptional circumstances, require the attendance of the party or the representative of the party seeking the adjournment.  If an adjournment is not granted and the party fails to attend the hearing the Tribunal may proceed with the hearing in that party’s absence.  If an adjournment is granted the Tribunal shall issue an order containing directions to ensure that the appeal can finally be determined within a reasonable time. Decisions and Reasons In some non-deportation Article 8 human rights and EUSS cases, the Tribunal may be able to give its decision shortly after the conclusion of the hearing by providing a short Notice of Decision or by stating its reasons orally. Reasons will only be provided orally where the Judge is satisfied that the audio recording facilities are available, and an audio recording will be made of the oral reasons. In other cases, written reasons should only be provided where they are expressly required by the Procedure Rules or where the interest of justice otherwise compels written reasons to be given and only to the extent and in terms necessary to dispose justly of the matter in hand. The reasons provided for any decision should be proportionate to the significance and the complexity of the disputed issues. Stating reasons at greater length than is necessary is not in the interests of justice. To do so is an inefficient use of judicial time. New Practice Direction Of The Immigration And Asylum Chamber Of The First-tier Tribunal

Since 31 January 2024, victims of transnational marriage abandonment can apply for a visa to return to the UK. This follows the landmark case of R on the application of AM -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022. Transitional marriage abandonment refers to the practice where a sponsor or their family abandons the partner abroad, often without financial support, to prevent their return to the UK. This may also involve children, who could be either abandoned with or separated from the partner. It is a coercive and controlling act that leaves the partner isolated, vulnerable, and unable to escape. Southall Black sisters were on the forefront of the fight for the rights of these migrant victims of domestic abuse and argued that when these women are abandoned abroad it amounts to an extreme form of psychological abuse, and it denies the women access to justice in the UK and amounts to a gross violation of human rights. Practice Direction 12J of the Family Proceedings Rules 2010 confirms that transnational marriage abandonment is a form of domestic abuse. Until recently immigration law lagged behind family jurisdiction in its response to this phenomenon and women in this position found it very difficult to return to the UK.  Stranded spouses have no recourse to returning to the UK because victims of domestic violence had to be in the UK in order to make an application under Section DVILR of Appendix FM.  In other words, the Rules have created a loophole where abusers can prevent their spouses from exercising their right to apply for indefinite leave to remain as a victim of domestic violence. In the case of AM -v- Secretary of State, a Pakistani national was married to a British citizen and she suffered severe financial, physical, emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of her husband for years whilst she was in the UK.  One day he forced her to travel to Pakistan with her two-year-old daughter and whilst in Pakistan he took her travel document away and came to the UK with their daughter.  Had she been in the UK she could have applied for indefinite leave to remain as a victim of domestic violence relying on section DVILR indefinite leave to remain (settlement as victim of domestic violence) but as we said above she could not have done it from abroad, therefore she applied for leave outside the Rules and asked to be granted indefinite leave to enter on the basis that she was a victim of domestic abuse.  The Home Office only granted her leave to enter outside the Rules for six months with no recourse to public funds and she challenged that decision.  The decision came in front of the Administrative Court and the Home Office granted her indefinite leave to remain. The Court found that victim of transnational marriage abandonment is an analogous situation to victims of domestic abuse in the UK and they have the expectation of settlement in the UK and suffer the same form of domestic abuse. Judge Lieven found that the lack of provision in the Rules for victims of transnational marriage abandonment was very great and not proportionate to the interference with their Article 8 rights and therefore she concluded that the differential treatment between victims of spousal abandonment inside and outside the UK is not justified and therefore in breach of Article 14 of the Human Rights Act 1998.  The Home Office did not appeal the Judgment and had to remedy the breach.  Now victims in this position can make an application under the new rule. The rules for victims of transnational marriage abandonments can be found in Appendix Victims of Domestic Violence that are very similar to the rules for victims of domestic abuse in the UK, although the guidance confirms that the standard of proof that victims of transnational marriage abandonment must meet is the reasonable degree of likelihood while victims of domestic abuse in a country must meet the higher balance of probability standard. What are the requirements for the application to succeed? An application must not fall for refusal under general grants of refusal which are found at Part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Regardless of whether they are inside or out, in order to be able to succeed, the last grant of leave must be on the basis of the relationship to someone who is a British national or has indefinite leave to be in the UK or is an EA national and has lived under the EU settlement scheme or is refugee. Those who have leave on the basis of a relationship to someone who is not settled such as a relationship with a student, will not be able to use this rule. The Applicant must show that the relationship broke down due to domestic abuse. The abuser does not necessarily need to be the partner, it could be another family member, as long as the abuse is the thing that led to the breakdown of the relationship. The requirement of abandonment outside the UK. This requirement is self-explanatory because victims of transnational marriage abandonment must have been abandoned outside the UK. Tuberculosis (TB) test. An applicant who has been abandoned in a country on the list of tuberculosis or have been there for six months or more will need to take a TB test. What application form does one need to complete? Applications are submitted online for return to the UK and if the Applicant is destitute and unable to pay the fee for the application, the Applicant can show that they do not have the means to pay the fees, they will be granted a fee waiver.  If the caseworker is not satisfied that the Applicant is eligible for a fee waiver, they should make additional enquiries.  Applicants will have to attend biometrics at the visa application centre and the guidance confirms that the Home Office can excuse Applicants from this requirement relying on the separate biometric guidance. The Applicant will have to provide evidence of identity. If an Applicant cannot provide, for example, a valid passport, the application might be rejected as invalid but there is a discretionary element to it.  The caseworkers have discretion to waive this requirement and then ask the Applicant not to submit proof of identity in some circumstances, for example when they have good reasons beyond their control why they cannot provide proof of their identity.  The Home Office in any event should have had a record of their identity and the caseworkers should consult the relevant Home Office records to make a decision and an application.  In practice, lots of victims of transnational marriage abandonments will not have the passport or biometric residence permit because their abusers will often take them away.  If obtaining a new passport is impossible, that should be explained, and the Applicant may use an alternative form of evidence such as national identity or birth certificate. What evidence is necessary to submit with the application? There is no mandatory evidence to be submitted, however, we would suggest That the Applicant provide a statement outlining: When and how the relationship started when she relocated to the UK The history of the domestic abuse in the UK, by whom and in what form and when they travelled abroad What was their understanding for the purpose and length of travel What happens once she was abroad, with whom she stayed, when did she realise that she was abandoned and what prevents her from returning to the UK. If she has children, whether the children are with her or have been separated from her and what difficulty she experienced abroad. If there has been a delay in making the application, an explanation as to the reason for the delay should be provided and confirm that the relationship ended and ended due to domestic abuse. Details of financial circumstances will be relevant if a fee waiver application is being made. If there are family proceedings in the UK such as wardship proceedings for the children or previous criminal proceedings or injunctions, this evidence will be helpful and should be provided. Before submitting any Family Court Orders one must make sure that she has permissions to do so and should get in touch with a family lawyer to find out whether permission can be obtained from the court and whether the documents can be disclosed. If there are other independent evidence of abuse such as text messages or approaching charities in the UK, that should be provided as well. Grants of status Successful Applicants will be granted indefinite leave to enter the UK and would be issued a visa valid for three months during which time they should travel to the UK and apply for E-visas.  The new Rules do not cater for victims of domestic violence who last leave was not in the relevant categories, a partner or those who left the UK of their own volition.  These will continue relying on caseworker discretion hoping to be granted leave outside the Rules.  There is no right of appeal against refusals.  

As people live longer and enjoy extended retirements, ensuring financial security and a rewarding lifestyle becomes increasingly important.Effective legal and estate planning can provide peace of mind and help address critical concerns. Explore our collection of articles to learn more about securing your future and that of your family: Inheritance Tax (IHT) Planning: How can you maximize your estate for your family? Leveraging existing provisions can help ensure that as much of your wealth as possible is passed on to your loved ones. Supporting Your Family: What steps can you take now to ease the burden on your family as you get older? Planning ahead can help manage care during illness and handle post-death logistics. Non-Executive Director Roles: Are you considering taking on a position as a non-executive director? These roles can offer financial rewards and personal satisfaction while allowing you to use your experience to help newer businesses. Adult Children Living at Home: What are the tax and estate planning considerations when adult children live with their parents? Both generations should be aware of these factors when planning for the future of their family home. Loss of Mental Capacity: How can you protect your business and support affected individuals if you or a key member loses mental capacity? It’s crucial to take action to safeguard operations and staff. Retirement Living Options: What new and exciting options are available for retirement living? Multi-purpose and mixed-use rental schemes are gaining popularity, offering flexible and diverse housing options. Predatory Marriage: How can you protect against predatory marriage? Understanding the risks and potential legal changes can help safeguard vulnerable individuals from those seeking financial advantage. By planning ahead, you can safeguard your assets and ensure a fulfilling retirement. It’s important to navigate the complexities of estate planning, mitigate risks, and explore opportunities for a secure and active future. Delve into our insights and find out how our private wealth team can assist with comprehensive legal and estate planning. Howard Kennedy campaign: legal estate planning for later life  

International divorce presents unique legal challenges, especially for ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWI), such as international professional athletes and business executives. Beyond Borders is a six-part series that delves into the complexities of cross-border divorce, featuring the fictional story of a Spanish footballer in the Premier League. The series highlights the risks of divorcing abroad and the intricacies of international family law. Written by our international family law expert Olalla Garcia-Arreciado, this series provides valuable insights into managing the financial, personal, and legal impacts of international divorce for international athletes and other UHNWI. Understanding Cross-Border Divorce for International Footballers International divorces often involve multi-jurisdictional conflicts, making issues like financial settlements, asset division, and child arrangements significantly more complex. For UHNWI, these challenges carry substantial financial risk, especially when wealth is spread across multiple countries. Each chapter of the Beyond Borders series addresses critical aspects of cross-border divorce, offering practical strategies to protect assets and navigate legal hurdles effectively. The series follows the fictional case study of Xabier and Sara, examining the legal and financial consequences of international divorce between Spain and England. It provides key insights for international footballers and other UHNWI on the following aspects: Protective Measures for Asset Protection: The importance of marriage contracts and nuptial agreements in safeguarding wealth. Jurisdictional Battles: Navigating the complexities of choosing between English and Spanish courts for financial settlements and other divorce-related issues. Asset Division: Addressing differences in legal definitions of marital and non-marital property across borders. Child Arrangements and Relocation: Discussing the best interests of a child and the involvement of agencies like CAFCASS. Post-Brexit Complications: The effects of Brexit on recognition and enforcement of orders between the UK and the EU. Reopening Financial Claims: The possibility of revisiting financial settlements in England after divorcing abroad. For HNWI and UHNWI, especially those in the public eye, legal matters can be intricate and highly sensitive. With international careers and substantial assets at stake, expert legal guidance is not just advantageous—it’s essential. Check out our case-study and find out how our specialist team can help navigate the complexities of international divorce and protect your financial interests. Howard Kennedy campaign: Beyond Borders - family law for international footballers and UHNWIs