Michael de Navarro KC KC > 2 Temple Gardens > London, England > Barrister Profile
2 Temple Gardens Offices

TEMPLE
LONDON
EC4Y 9AY
England
- Set Profile
- Go to...
Michael de Navarro KC KC

Work Department
Clinical Negligence, Personal Injury, Professional Negligence, Health & Safety
Position
Personal injury, clinical and professional negligence, insurance and health and safety at work.
Career
Reported clinical negligence cases include NAX v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2018], Manzi v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2018] (CA), Hamed v Dr Mills and ors [2015],R v RNOH [2012], Notts CC v Bottomley and anor [2010], Whiston v London SHA, Knight v South Essex Health Authority [2008], CJL v West Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2009], Antoniades v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust [2007], Cowley v Cheshire and Merseyside Strategic Health Authority [2006], YM v Gloucestershire NHS Foundation Trust [2006], Macey v Warwickshire HA [2004], Page v Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust [2004], Royal Victoria Infirmary v B [2002]. Reported personal injury cases include Adams v SEB [1993] (CA), Green v Building Scene [1994] (CA), O’Shea v Kingston-upon-Thames [1995] (CA), Hunter v Butler [1995] (CA), Jolley v LB of Sutton [1998] (CA), [2001] (HL). Other reported cases include Wentworth v Wiltshire CC [1992] (CA), Nykredit Mortgage Bank v Edward Erdman [1996] (HL), John Monroe (Acrylics) v LFCDA [1997] (CA), Day v Cook [2000], Miller v Hales [2006] and Smith v Skanska Construction Services Ltd [2008].
Called 1968, QC 1990. Bencher Inner Temple 2000.
Memberships
PIBA (Committee member 1995, Chairman 1997-99). Western Circuit.
Education
Downside School; Trinity College, Cambridge (MA Classics/Economics).
Leisure
Music, cricket, gardening, cooking.
PERSONAL:
Born 1944; resides Broadway.
Lawyer Rankings
London Bar > Clinical negligence
(Leading Silks)Ranked: Tier 2Michael de Navarro KC –2 Temple Gardens ‘Hugely experienced. Excellent fundamental factual and legal analysis, but then also able to step back and heed the realities and practicalities of the risks of litigation to give sound pragmatic and practical advice.’