{"id":143090,"date":"2026-07-10T11:10:32","date_gmt":"2026-07-10T11:10:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/?post_type=comparative_guide&#038;p=143090"},"modified":"2026-07-10T11:10:32","modified_gmt":"2026-07-10T11:10:32","slug":"united-kingdom-litigation","status":"publish","type":"comparative_guide","link":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/chapter\/united-kingdom-litigation\/","title":{"rendered":"United Kingdom: Litigation"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-143090","comparative_guide","type-comparative_guide","status-publish","hentry","guides-litigation","jurisdictions-united-kingdom"],"acf":[],"appp":{"post_list":{"below_title":"<div class=\"guide-author-details\"><span class=\"guide-author\">Slaughter and May<\/span><span class=\"guide-author-logo\"><img src=\"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1\/2018\/11\/SM-New-Brand-logo.jpg\"\/><\/span><\/div>"},"post_detail":{"above_title":"<div class=\"guide-author-details\"><span class=\"guide-author\">Slaughter and May<\/span><span class=\"guide-author-logo\"><img src=\"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/1\/2018\/11\/SM-New-Brand-logo.jpg\"\/><\/span><\/div>","below_title":"<span class=\"guide-intro\">This country specific Q&amp;A provides an overview of Litigation laws and regulations applicable in United Kingdom<\/span><div class=\"guide-content\"><div class=\"filter\">\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" placeholder=\"Search questions and answers...\" class=\"filter-container__search-field\">\r\n\t\t\t<\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<ol class=\"custom-counter\">\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What are the main methods of resolving disputes in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The three main methods of resolving commercial disputes in the UK are litigation, arbitration and mediation. Litigation usually commences in the High Court pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules (\u201cCPR\u201d). Arbitration is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996 (as recently amended by the Arbitration Act 2025) and the New York Convention. Both are adversarial processes. Mediation is a non-adversarial structured negotiation led by a neutral mediator with a view to agreeing a settlement. It is also not uncommon for parties to resolve a matter through negotiation either directly or through their legal representatives.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What are the main procedural rules governing litigation in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The CPR govern the procedural aspects of litigation. The rules are designed to ensure that cases are dealt with justly and at proportionate cost. The CPR are supplemented by practice directions (\u201cPD\u201d) which provide practical guidance on the rules. The general scheme is that individual areas of civil procedure are governed by parts of the CPR, with almost every part being supplemented by one or more PD. The CPR and PD cover all stages of litigation, from initiating proceedings to the appeal process.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What is the structure and organisation of local courts dealing with claims in your jurisdiction? What is the final court of appeal?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>A commercial claim should be made in the High Court if it is worth more than \u00a3100,000. The trial will be heard before one judge. If the judgment is contested, either party may seek permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal where a case will ordinarily be heard by a panel of three judges. The final court of appeal is the Supreme Court where normally five Justices hear an appeal, but it can be more in special cases.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">How long does it typically take from commencing proceedings to get to trial in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The basic timetable is dictated by the CPR, but considerable discretion is left to the court to fix the deadlines for each stage of the litigation process depending upon the complexity of the case. It is not uncommon to take at least 18 months to get to trial even for a relatively straightforward commercial dispute. Other cases can take much longer. Judges treat procedural deadlines seriously and can impose sanctions on parties causing delays (these can include adverse costs orders or, in extreme cases, strike out orders). The Shorter Trials Scheme allows parties in the Business and Property Courts, a section of the High Court that hears many commercial disputes, to get from issuing proceedings to judgment in less than a year. It is therefore worth considering this route for relatively simple claims with minimal disclosure and limited evidence. Parties should, however, factor in the time for any appeals, which can be considerable as both the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court are very busy. Alternatively, the Flexible Trials Scheme in the Business and Property Courts is designed to limit disclosure and allow for earlier trial dates, within a more standard procedural framework.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">Are hearings held in public and are documents filed at court available to the public in your jurisdiction? Are there any exceptions?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Statements of case are filed on a public register and can (in general) be searched and copied by members of the public. Hearings take place and judgments are handed down in public, other than in exceptional circumstances where the court decides that a hearing must be in private. The exceptional circumstances include where publicity would defeat the object of the hearing, where the hearing involves matters relating to national security, and where the hearing involves confidential information (including information relating to personal financial matters) and publicity would damage that confidentiality.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the relevant limitation periods in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Limitation periods for different types of claims are set out in the Limitation Act 1980. These include a basic six-year limitation period for claims relating to contract, tort, or breach of trust. For negligence claims for personal injury, the limitation period is the later of six years from the date the damage occurred or three years from the date on which the claimant had the requisite knowledge and the right to bring the claim (with an overriding time limit of 15 years from the date of the negligent act or omission). Other limitation periods include one year for claims for defamation and twelve years for claims brought in respect of deeds. Time limits may be extended in certain circumstances (for example, where there has been fraud or deliberate concealment).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the pre-action conduct requirements in your jurisdiction and what, if any, are the consequences of non-compliance?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>There are different pre-action protocols for some of the most common types of claims, such as debt claims or professional negligence claims. There is also a general PD which applies if no specific pre-action protocol applies. It ensures that the parties have exchanged sufficient information to understand each other\u2019s position, make decisions on how to proceed, attempt to settle issues without proceedings and support the efficient management of proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>Compliance with the pre-action protocols is not mandatory but the court might take non-compliance into account when awarding costs or considering case management directions. It is therefore advisable to follow the relevant protocol whenever possible (although in some cases, such as when a limitation period is about to expire, it might be necessary to issue a claim and then engage in correspondence with the other side).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">How are proceedings commenced in your jurisdiction? Is service necessary and, if so, is this done by the court (or its agent) or by the parties?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Proceedings are commenced when the court issues a claim form (by stamping it with the court\u2019s seal), as prepared and requested by the claimant. The claim form is the first \u201cstatement of case\u201d and includes the name of the court in which the claimant wants the claim to be heard, the parties\u2019 names and addresses, a brief summary of the claim and a description of the remedy sought by the claimant. Once the claim form has been issued, the claimant must serve it on the defendant within four months, if the defendant is within the jurisdiction (or six months if service is to take place outside the jurisdiction, in which case the court\u2019s permission may be required). Service can be effected by the claimant or the court (but it is advisable for a claimant to effect service itself).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">How does the court determine whether it has jurisdiction over a claim in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The rules on jurisdiction have been affected by the UK\u2019s withdrawal from the EU at the end of 2020. The courts now apply the common law rules, or the rules set out in the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Under the common law rules, the court has jurisdiction if the claim form is served on the defendant whilst it is physically present in England or Wales, if the defendant submits to the jurisdiction voluntarily, or if the court gives permission for service out of the jurisdiction under one of the specific heads of jurisdiction (which broadly require showing a connection between the defendant or the dispute and England or Wales). Unlike under the Recast Brussels Regulation, the court has considerable discretion under the common law rules to refuse to exercise its jurisdiction over a defendant (regardless of whether they are in England or overseas) on the basis that England and Wales is not the most appropriate forum to hear the dispute. The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements applies where there is a qualifying exclusive jurisdiction agreement between the parties designating a particular court to resolve a particular dispute.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">How does the court determine which law governs the claims in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Broadly, following the UK\u2019s withdrawal from the EU, the choice of law rules set out in the Rome I and Rome II Regulations continue to apply, as the UK has retained them in domestic legislation. The Rome I Regulation applies to contractual obligations and the Rome II Regulation applies to non-contractual obligations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">In what circumstances, if any, can claims be disposed of without a full trial in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The court has extensive powers of active case management, enabling it to strike out the whole or part of a statement of case which discloses no reasonable grounds, is likely to obstruct the just disposal of the proceedings, or fails to comply with the CPR, PD or court order. The court can also give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant where it determines that their claim has no real prospect of success and there is no other reason the case should go to trial. \u201cReal prospect\u201d is quite a low threshold in practice and has been interpreted to mean that the case is not fanciful.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the main types of interim remedies available in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The main types of interim remedies are interim injunctions, which can either require a party to do a specific act or to refrain from doing a specific act. Examples of interim injunctions include an order that a party preserves certain relevant evidence or (in more extreme cases) allows another party to take copies of that party\u2019s IT systems, and an order that \u201cfreezes\u201d some or all of a party\u2019s assets (these so-called \u201cfreezing injunctions\u201d are particularly effective in cases of suspected fraud, where money and other assets can be preserved until the claim is determined).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">After a claim has been commenced, what written documents must (or can) the parties submit in your jurisdiction? What is the usual timetable?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The claimant must submit a document called a particulars of claim, outlining its case. The document can be served with the claim form or within 14 days after the claim form has been served. Once the defendant has been served, it has 14 days to file a defence (or 28 days if it chooses to file an acknowledgement of service first). If there are further relevant points to plead, the claimant may file a reply. Following the pleadings stage, both parties must also submit directions questionnaires, which help the court decide which court or division is most appropriate to hear the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the rules for disclosure of documents in your jurisdiction? Are there any exceptions (e.g. on grounds of privilege, confidentiality or public interest)?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The existence of all documents which are or have been in the party\u2019s control, and which harm or support its or another party\u2019s case, must be disclosed in litigation. This includes privileged documents. However, a party can withhold privileged documents from inspection by the other side; so even though the other side knows about the existence of those documents, it cannot view them. Types of privilege include privilege against self-incrimination, public interest immunity, legal advice privilege, litigation privilege, without prejudice privilege and common interest privilege. In October 2022, the Business and Property Courts formally introduced their own disclosure regime under Practice Direction 57AD (which largely mirrors the Disclosure Pilot Scheme which had been in force since 2019). This regime is designed to encourage a proportionate and bespoke approach to disclosure and, accordingly, to address the time and cost challenges often presented by large numbers of electronic documents.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">How is witness evidence dealt with in your jurisdiction (and in particular, do witnesses give oral and\/or written evidence and what, if any, are the rules on cross-examination)? Are depositions permitted?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Witnesses can be summoned to attend court. However, the normal procedure is for each side to produce and exchange written witness statements on which they intend to rely well in advance of trial. These can be drafted by solicitors for the parties but must reflect the witnesses\u2019 own words. The witness then typically confirms this evidence in person at trial, together with giving any additional oral evidence, and then the other side is allowed to cross-examine the witness. Depositions are permitted in front of a judge, an examiner of the court or any other person the court appoints, but they are unusual. In April 2021, PD 57AC introduced new rules for trial witness statements in the Business and Property Courts. These rules aim to reduce lengthy and \u201cover-lawyered\u201d witness statements and require, amongst other things, that a witness statement lists any documents that the witness has referred or been referred to when preparing it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">Is expert evidence permitted in your jurisdiction? If so, how is it dealt with (and in particular, are experts appointed by the court or the parties, and what duties do they owe)?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Expert evidence is permitted at the court\u2019s discretion. An expert\u2019s primary role is to assist the court on technical matters. Experts owe a duty to exercise skill and care and to comply with the CPR and their relevant code of ethics. They have an overriding duty to help the court \u2013 a duty which overrides any obligation to the person instructing them or paying them. In complex cases it is not unusual for each side to instruct their own expert on one or more issues, although the court has the power to order a single expert to be instructed jointly. Experts typically exchange written reports and then seek to agree a joint statement setting out points on which they agree and disagree. They are then cross-examined separately at trial or, as part of a process called \u201chot tubbing\u201d, they may appear simultaneously and answer common questions from both sides\u2019 counsel and the judge.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">Can final and interim decisions be appealed in your jurisdiction? If so, to which court(s) and within what timescale?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Permission to appeal must be given by the court before a decision can be appealed. An application for permission to appeal can be made either to the lower court at the hearing at which the decision to be appealed was made or to the appeal court. If an application is made to the appeal court, it must be requested in an \u201cappellant\u2019s notice\u201d. This must be filed within 21 days to appeal to the Court of Appeal against a County Court or High Court decision. Appeals to the Supreme Court must be made within 28 days and will be permitted only if the court is satisfied that the appeal raises an arguable point of law of general public importance \u2013 in practice a very high threshold.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What are the rules governing enforcement of foreign judgments in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Foreign judgments may be enforced in England according to rules of common law or, where there is a reciprocal enforcement arrangement between the UK and the relevant foreign state, according to rules made under that arrangement. Under the common law rules, a foreign judgment is enforceable only if it is final and conclusive (and for a sum of money). A judgment debtor brings a new claim in England and recovers the amount owing under the foreign judgment as a debt. Reciprocal enforcement arrangements consist of two sorts: (1) bilateral treaties between the UK and various foreign countries, many of which are Commonwealth states (including Canada and Australia), which allow final and conclusive money judgments to be registered with the court and then enforced as if they were English judgments; and (2) international agreements to which the UK is party. The most significant by far is the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements. Judgments given by the courts of contracting states (which include the EU Member States) in proceedings founded on qualifying exclusive jurisdiction agreements can be registered with the court and enforced in the same way as English judgments, subject only to a narrow range of defences. The 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, to which the UK and EU Member States (excluding Denmark) are also party expands the regime of the 2005 Convention to a broader range of judgments. However the 2019 Convention applies only to judgments in proceedings started after the Convention came into force as between the UK and the relevant foreign state (1 July 2025 for the UK and the EU);<\/p>\n<p>The EU rules &#8211; which provide a near automatic right to enforce Member State judgments in other Member States \u2013 have not applied in and to the UK since 31 December 2020, but judgments in proceedings started on or before that date are grandfathered by the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement and continue to be enforceable in accordance with EU law.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">Can the costs of litigation (e.g. court costs, as well as the parties\u2019 costs of instructing lawyers, experts and other professionals) be recovered from the other side in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Generally, the winning party in litigation is entitled to recover the costs of litigation from the losing opponent, as the costs are awarded to \u201cindemnify\u201d the winning party for the cost and expenses incurred in vindicating or defending their rights. However, it is rare that the winner will be fully indemnified (a general rule of thumb is 50-70% recovery). There is a general \u201cno profit\u201d rule providing that the costs awarded can never exceed the sums the party has actually incurred. In determining costs, the court considers a variety of factors, including the party\u2019s conduct during trial.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the collective redress (e.g. class action) mechanisms in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>There are various procedural mechanisms which can be used to bring a \u201cgroup action\u201d in England: joint claims by multiple claimants; consolidation of separate claims into one set of proceedings, which can be managed together; group litigation orders (\u201cGLOs\u201d), where multiple individually commenced claims have common or related issues of fact or law; and representative claims, where one representative acts on behalf of one or more persons with the same interest in the claim (but the \u201csame interest\u201d requirement is interpreted narrowly for this purpose). There is also a much more liberal collective actions regime for competition law claims pursued in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (\u201cCAT\u201d). The CAT has a wide discretion to certify claims initiated on behalf of, for example, victims of a cartel, on an opt-out or opt-in basis, and approve collective settlements where appropriate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, are the mechanisms for joining third parties to ongoing proceedings and\/or consolidating two sets of proceedings in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The procedures to add third parties to ongoing proceedings or to consolidate two sets of proceedings are outlined in the CPR. Court approval is generally required (although a defendant can bring a contribution \/ indemnity claim against a third party without permission at the time of filing the defence). To add parties to ongoing proceedings, the court must find that it is \u201cdesirable\u201d to add the new party to resolve the matter. The test for joint claimants is that the claims can be \u201cconveniently\u201d disposed of in the same proceedings. For a group litigation order to be made, the issues must be common or related.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">Are third parties allowed to fund litigation in your jurisdiction? If so, are there any restrictions on this and can third party funders be made liable for the costs incurred by the other side?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Third party litigation funding is permitted, subject to the rule that it must not interfere with the administration of justice. In practice this means that a funder must not control or seek to control the conduct of the litigation it is supporting. The UK has become the world\u2019s second largest market for litigation funding and its use is particularly common in class action disputes (including cartel damages claims in the CAT and securities law cases). However this remains a complex and developing area and statutory reform to place litigation funding and its regulation on a firmer footing are expected in the next 12 months. At present, and subject to the general law and broader rules of public policy, litigation funding is self-regulated. Members of the Association of Litigation Funders agree to follow the \u201cCode of Conduct for Litigation Funders\u201d produced by the Association of Litigation Funders. Third party funders can be made liable for costs incurred by the other side.<\/p>\n<p>In June 2025, the Civil Justice Council made recommendations for reforms to the regulatory framework for litigation funding. The Government has announced that it will adopt the primary recommendations and bring forward legislation to reverse the effects of a 2023 Supreme Court decision which effectively barred funders from recovering a percentage of any damages received by claimants they financed; and introduce a mandatory system of light-touch regulation of funding agreements.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What has been the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on litigation in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated widespread and immediate changes to the use of remote hearings in commercial litigation. The adoption of remote hearings was facilitated by provisions in the UK\u2019s emergency Coronavirus Act 2020, new PD in the CPR, and other informal guidance. Post-COVID, remote hearings have become staples of the commercial litigation landscape. In the Business and Property Courts, hearings scheduled for under half a day and all application hearings scheduled on a Friday are typically held remotely by default. However, whilst the courts have embraced digital dispute resolution as a further mechanism by which to ensure cases are dealt with at a proportionate cost, face-to-face hearings are still recognised as the \u201cgold standard\u201d (particularly for complex cases).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What is the main advantage and the main disadvantage of litigating international commercial disputes in your jurisdiction?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>One of the main advantages of the English courts is their global reach. London\u2019s status as a global commercial centre means that defendants face a heavy price if they do not obey the court\u2019s orders, as significant commercial actors can rarely afford to be unable to come to London or have assets in the jurisdiction. This makes London a popular forum for fraud cases, where the power to compel worldwide asset preservation and disclosure is key. Costs are the main disadvantage, although London is not alone in this and parties can mitigate the high costs of litigation by having up-front conversations with their legal advisers about the economies of litigation (which may involve utilising, for example, the Shorter Trial Scheme) and potential alternatives (such as mediation or settlement).<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What is the most likely growth area for commercial disputes in your jurisdiction for the next 5 years?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Class actions continue to see exponential growth. These are more established in jurisdictions such as the US, Canada, and Australia but procedures are now in place in England and Wales to make claims easier to commence and manage and law firms and litigation funders are more adept at gathering and funding classes. There have been significant developments in the class action regime in the CAT recently, which have resulted in a significant increase in the number of competition class action proceedings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"question-block filter-container__element\">\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"filter-container__match-html\">What, if any, will be the impact of technology on commercial litigation in your jurisdiction in the next 5 years?<\/h3>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<button id=\"show-me\">+<\/button>\r\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"question_answer filter-container__match-html\" style=\"display:none;\"><p>Artificial intelligence is the buzz word across London legal practice. There is now near universal consideration and adoption of \u201cLegal AI\u201d which has significantly improved in quality and practical utility. There is now no doubt that these impacts will be significant \u2013 it is just an open question as to the degree. This will place an even greater emphasis on lawyers to focus on the specific problems faced by their clients and to tailor their advice carefully in order to work as efficiently as possible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t\t\r\n<div class=\"word-count-hidden\" style=\"display:none;\">Estimated word count: <span class=\"word-count\">3937<\/span><\/div>\r\n\r\n\t\t\t<\/ol>\r\n\r\n<script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"\/wp-content\/themes\/twentyseventeen\/src\/jquery\/components\/filter-guides.js\" async><\/script><\/div>"}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comparative_guide\/143090","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comparative_guide"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/comparative_guide"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/guides\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=143090"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}