{"id":1914,"date":"2019-02-05T10:43:10","date_gmt":"2019-02-05T10:43:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/student.multisite.legal500.com\/?page_id=1914"},"modified":"2024-06-18T15:23:48","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T15:23:48","slug":"how-to-get-a-training-contract-the-application-process","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/my.legal500.com\/future-lawyers\/career-clinic\/how-to-get-a-training-contract-the-application-process\/","title":{"rendered":"How to get a training contract: The application process"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The first step of the training contract application process is the application form. Most law firms now use application forms to screen applicants before deciding who to invite for interview.<\/p>\n

There’s no getting away from the fact that filling out application forms can be a time-consuming process, but with plenty of preparation and good proofreading skills, you can make sure you’re giving yourself the best possible chance of success.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

First impressions count<\/h3>\n

Hard to believe, but many applicants still fall at the first and most obvious hurdle: spelling and grammar on application forms. You may be heading for a First from a top university and be captain of the rugby team, but if you can\u2019t spell the word \u2018liaise\u2019 on your application form, you\u2019ll be drop-kicked straight into the rubbish bin.<\/p>\n

\u2018The reason for most of our rejections is poor spelling and grammar\u2019, says a graduate recruiter at a major US firm in London. \u2018As a lawyer, you will want your advice to be trusted by the client; if the first thing they see is a typo, even if the advice is spot on, it will introduce a level of doubt. Attention to detail is a must.\u2019<\/p>\n

If possible, download the form or print it off and work on a draft copy. Make sure you spell-check it (by eye as well as using a spell-checker) and then paste it back into the online application. If the form states how many lines \/ words you can use per question, stay within those limits. If the firm prints off the forms, anything written beyond the word limit may not be read.<\/p>\n

Easy as ABC<\/h3>\n

Probably the single biggest bugbear among recruiters is stating the wrong firm name on the application, e.g. \u2018I\u2019d like to work at Slaughter and May because\u2026\u2019 on a form for Irwin Mitchell. It may seem silly but you would be surprised how commonly this occurs, especially when making multiple applications. And the use of cut-and-paste online applications has only aggravated the problem.<\/p>\n

Remember that every firm you are applying to wants to see evidence that you have specifically selected that firm as the place where you wish to pursue your career. A graduate recruitment insider at a US firm in London says: \u2018If we cannot see why you have applied to us over all of the other London offices of US-based firms, we cannot take your application further.\u2019<\/p>\n

It sounds obvious, but one of the most common pieces of advice from recruiters is: read, re-read and re-read your application(s) again. Better still, get someone else to read them \u2013 it\u2019s easy to read what you expect to see rather than what is actually there. \u2018Spelling and grammar errors are non-negotiable for a law firm and provide recruiters with an easy reason to reject a candidate, regardless of their other attributes,\u2019 cautions a trainee recruitment manager at Norton Rose Fulbright.<\/p>\n

Words are a lawyer\u2019s stock-in-trade, and if your written English isn\u2019t up to scratch, you are unlikely to be invited for an interview. The firm may well take the view that if you can\u2019t use words accurately, you simply won\u2019t function in this profession.<\/p>\n

It cannot be stressed enough that poor presentation (whether written or verbal) is simply not going to be tolerated by firms. After all, when you do finally make it, clients will take your knowledge of the law as read: you will be judged equally on your presentation skills and ability to communicate.<\/p>\n

Problem areas<\/h3>\n

We know it\u2019s no walk in the park. It\u2019s not easy selling yourself on two sides of A4 or an online form with endless, predictable questions.<\/p>\n

The sections which most trouble students are competency questions, e.g. \u2018Outline a situation where you have overcome a barrier and achieved a required outcome\u2019. \u2018Students tend to be too descriptive and not analytical enough\u2019, says one university careers adviser.<\/p>\n

Of course, such self-analysis does not always come easy. Testing life experiences, let alone corporate lingo, are not necessarily going to be at your fingertips as a student or a young professional. But all experience is relevant: think back to that weekend job you had at Tesco working with difficult customers, and you’ll soon realise that there were plenty of instances where you overcame barriers!<\/p>\n

Most careers services offer help with preparing CVs and completing application forms, as well as providing general interview preparation. They will usually be happy to read over your application form and offer some pointers as to the style, as well as the content.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Competency questions such as \u2018describe a situation where you worked in a team\u2019 or \u2018describe a situation in which you solved a problem\u2019 are common in application forms.<\/p>\n

\u2018From memory of being a graduate myself years ago,\u2019 recalls one old-hand in the recruitment sector, \u2018I used to be stumped by some of these questions. But don\u2019t think if you haven\u2019t done glamorous teamwork like climbing to the top of Mount Kilimanjaro, it doesn\u2019t count. It\u2019s worth looking through all your experiences and extra-curricular activities to analyse what you have gained from them \u2013 really think about where you are getting your evidence from.\u00a0 <\/span>Also, it’s easy to be short-sighted so don\u2019t just focus on the past six or 12 months. Try to analyse experiences that really mean something to you \u2013 it\u2019s easier to sound convincing if you are passionate about your subject \u2013 and never make things up \u2013 it will be painfully obvious and embarrassing when you\u2019re found out!\u2019<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Other problem areas are the obscure or quirky questions, such as \u2018which character in fiction do you resemble and why?\u2019 Students commonly assume that these are \u2018trick\u2019 questions, designed to catch them out and unveil say, a passion for trashy novels. But firms deny the use or the value of trickery \u2013 they maintain that more out-of-the-ordinary questions are just another way of seeking evidence of relevant skills, such as leadership. The bottom line is, if you\u2019re not sure what a question is asking of you, do some research or ask your friends, family members or careers service. If all else fails, contact someone in the relevant firm’s graduate recruitment team. All the recruiters we spoke to would rather you call than answer incorrectly.<\/p>\n

It’s crucial to ensure that you answer the question being asked. It sounds obvious, but take a question at face value and answer it as thoroughly as you would an exam question.<\/p>\n

Technical glitch<\/h3>\n

By far the preferred method of recruitment today is via online applications. But that comes with its own problems. Some systems are badly designed, and it is extremely frustrating when candidates are automatically thrown out if they do not have a 2(1) or are non-EU citizens, for example. There is no opportunity for explanations and it gives a highly negative impression of the firm. Most firms’ application forms will have a section where you can add extenuating circumstances or additional information which might help your case. If not, do send an email or make a call to the graduate recruitment team.<\/p>\n

The other common mistake is the use by applicants of sloppy or casual language, ie email or text talk. Under no circumstances should you write, \u2018I\u2019d like to wk @ Simmons coz\u2026.\u2019 The firm will expect the same standard of presentation on the form as they would for a hard copy, so do not be tempted to use a chatty, email style or abbreviated words. Our advice is to adapt each application carefully to the firm you are currently applying to and read through each online application as you would a paper one.<\/p>\n

And a bit of a plea on behalf of a graduate recruiter who has to read nearly 3,000 forms a year \u2013 \u2018Do keep things concise, and make the answers easy to read and interesting!\u2019<\/p>\n

Timing is everything<\/h3>\n

There is a consensus among careers advisers that firms do not fully appreciate the time constraints students are under, and how difficult it is to fit application form filling into a busy academic schedule. It\u2019s understandable that more than a bit of cut-and-pasting goes on.<\/p>\n

\u2018Interviews used to be a friendly chat for an hour or so on campus, end of story. Now firms want students to give up a day or more, at their offices, in term time. But they also want people with a 2(1)!\u2019, comments David Ainscough deputy director of the University of Cambridge Careers Service. \u2018We try to persuade firms to interview at the university or during vacations. Students who may be pressured to sacrifice academic work should consult the tutor who will be writing their references. Tutors can often exert influence on firms, and will want to help their pupils to manage their time sensibly.\u2019<\/p>\n

Sounds like a little mutual understanding between firms and students is needed. Recruiters: students are under huge pressures these days; cranking up the timetable does nobody any favours. Applicants: less is more; apply to fewer firms but make each application count. Try to find out as much as possible about the firms in advance so you can really target your applications to the firms that appear to suit you.<\/p>\n

\n

Helpful hints (from the graduate recruiters themselves)<\/h3>\n