The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Jeremy Weston QC

Work 0121 236 0863
Fax 0121 236 6961

Michelle Caney

Work 0121 236 0863
St Ives Chambers (Chambers of Jeremy Weston QC)

Work Department

Michelle Caney is a Barrister specialising in Business, Property and Housing law.  Michelle regularly presents seminars and lectures within her areas of expertise.  Such talks can be arranged via the clerks and can be presented at the dedicated facilities within chambers or externally. CPD approval can be obtained if required.


Michelle Caney is a specialist Business and Property practitioner, with a particular focus on real property and commercial property litigation.  She also has a national reputation and extensive experience in the field of social housing.

Michelle is consistently recommended in the directories in which she is praised for being “technically brilliant”, “exceptionally hardworking” and “exemplary in terms of client care, trial preparation and advocacy skills”.

Michelle is a “a go-to property litigator” who “punches well above her year of call”.


Year of Call: 2004

Business and Property

Michelle Caney is a specialist business and property practitioner, with a particular focus on property litigation.

Michelle has a strong reputation in the field and is consistently recommended in the directories, which praise her “superb technical knowledge, confident authoritative manner with clients, and brilliant cross-examination”.  Recognised as being an “outstanding and tenacious advocate”, Michelle fights her client’s corner robustly, whilst managing their expectations sensitively.  Michelle has extensive experience and is regularly instructed in complex, high value litigation above her level of call.

In addition to her court work, Michelle has a busy paperwork practice and is commended for her immaculate preparation and “thorough grasp of every detail” of each case.  In an advisory capacity, Michelle is commercial and pragmatic, always keeping her client’s key objectives and proportionality at the forefront of her mind.

Michelle’s areas of expertise include:


  • Adverse possession
  • Boundary disputes
  • Easements
  • Nuisance
  • Restrictive covenants
  • Rectification claims
  • Trespass
  • Trusts of land and equitable interests
  • Professional negligence


  • Banking and finance
  • Contractual disputes
  • Construction claims, including Asbestos related litigation
  • Business lease renewals and terminations
  • Forfeiture
  • Dilapidations
  • Partnership disputes
  • Mortgages and guarantees
Housing Law

Michelle Caney is a specialist property practitioner with a national reputation and extensive experience in the field of social housing.

Michelle is routinely praised for her meticulous preparation and is consistently recommended in the directories, which confirm that she is “exceptionally thorough and knows her stuff inside out” and commend her “superb technical knowledge, confident authoritative manner with clients, and brilliant cross-examination.”  Michelle prides herself on maintaining a client-focused approach at all times.

Michelle’s expertise covers the full range of housing litigation, with a particular emphasis on cases involving issues of human rights, mental capacity, disability discrimination, community care or judicial review.  Her busy practice encompasses:

  • Possession claims
  • Demotion claims
  • Injunctions/committals
  • Community care issues
  • Disability discrimination
  • Human rights/public law challenges
  • Homelessness and Allocations
  • Harassment claims
  • Unlawful eviction
  • Right to buy
  • Succession
  • Service charge disputes
  • Disrepair
  • Judicial review
  • Gang injunctions

Notable Cases

Midland Heart Limited v. Grant [2016]

Appeal concerning the correct application of the refined test set out by the Supreme Court in Akerman-Liverstone v. Aster Communities Limited [2015] UKSC 15 where a landlord is asking a court to summarily dismiss a disability discrimination defence.

(1) Rehman and (1) Rehman v. Ali and Others [2015] EWHC

High Court claim concerning the ownership of a Mosque, which was alleged to be held on a charitable trust for the benefit of the community.  Michelle successfully represented the legal owners and secured a possession order following a 17 day trial.

Dunn v. (1) Katerina Allington T/A Property Pushers and (2) Property Pushers Limited [2014] EWHC

Complex commercial trial in the High Court involving a property development company in which Michelle secured judgment in excess of £740,000.

Wolverhampton City Council v. Shuttleworth [2012] LTL 13/12/2013

Michelle successfully appealed to the High Court on a novel point of law concerning introductory tenancies.

Arena Coventry Limited v. Coventry City Football Club Limited [2012]

High profile litigation in the High Court involving Coventry City Football Club.

Leeds and Yorkshire Housing Association v Vertigan [2010] EWCA Civ 1583 

Michelle successfully opposed an appeal to the Court of Appeal in an important case concerning the interplay between undertakings and suspended possession orders.


Chambers & Partners 2019: “Very bright and gets on well with clients. She is good at guiding them through the case and is very thorough.” “A very good advocate.”

Chambers & Partners 2019: “Exemplary in terms of client care, trial preparation and advocacy skills.” “An exceptional barrister with a breadth of knowledge on all aspects of social housing.”

Legal 500 2018: “Exceptionally hardworking and punches well above her year of call.”

Legal 500 2018:“A go-to property litigator.”

Chambers & Partners 2018: “Technically brilliant and thorough. No stone is left unturned. She is meticulous with her preparation.” “A superb advocate who is fantastic with witnesses.”

Chambers & Partners 2018: “She provides comprehensive advice, makes clear points and always addresses all the points put to her.” “She is exceptionally hard-working and very clever.”

Legal 500 2017:“Beneath her cool, calm exterior is a fiery, formidable opponent.”

Legal 500 2017: “She makes vulnerable witnesses feel at ease.”

Chambers and Partners 2017: “Superb advocate with extremely detailed preparation in trials.” “She’s forensic in preparation, goes way above and beyond and has an utterly thorough grasp of every detail of the case.”

Legal 500 2016: “An excellent advocate, who is well respected by judges.”

Chambers and Partners 2016: “Superb technical knowledge, confident authoritative manner with clients, and brilliant cross-examination.” “She is incredibly conscientious. Nothing gets past her gaze.”

Legal 500 2015: "Her advocacy and cross-examination skills are superb." "She is always incredibly well prepared for conferences and hearings."

Chambers and Partners 2015: “She is an excellent advocate. She doesn’t miss anything, and she puts up a very good fight.” “She is an absolute professional, is always well prepared and always manages to know how to treat difficult defendants.”

Chambers & Partners 2014 “She is incredibly efficient and extremely organised.” “She is exceptionally thorough and knows her stuff inside out.”

Legal 500 2014: "She has wide-ranging commercial and Chancery expertise."

Chambers & Partners 2014: “She listens to her clients carefully and does what they want her to do. She will fight tooth and nail if she feels it is a good case to argue.” “Technically she is excellent, but she is also down to earth, which is crucial with social housing.”

Chambers and Partners 2013: “Michelle is an outstanding and tenacious advocate respected by judges. She is able to quickly build rapport with clients, witnesses and instructing solicitors.”

Legal 500 2012: St Ives Chambers is "an excellent specialist housing set".  Michelle Caney is "well prepared, eloquent and persuasive."

Legal 500 2011: St Ives Chambers’ leading housing law team includes Michelle Caney, who is "hugely talented", "consistently excellent and utterly reliable", and is praised for her "immaculate preparation."

Legal 500 2010: Michelle Caney, "an incredibly dedicated, hardworking and gifted" junior, is "down to earth, practical and excellent in both court and negotiations."




Midland Circuit

Social Housing Law Association


Birmingham University, LLB (Hons) Law.

Nottingham School of Law, BVC.

Regional Bar: Midland Circuit

Commercial, banking, insolvency and Chancery law

Within: Leading Juniors

Michelle Caney - St Ives ChambersAn excellent all-rounder.

[back to top]


Within: Leading Juniors

Michelle Caney - St Ives ChambersHas an encyclopaedic knowledge of housing law.

[back to top]

Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to

    Since a very long time, FIDIC (The International Federation of Consulting Engineers) is commonly used a standard for international construction and engineering contracts and is very frequently used in UAE. It mainly governs the construction works within the country and in GCC. 
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.