The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Chambers of Kevin Prosser QC

Living Wage
16 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON, WC1R 4EF, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 020 7414 8080
Fax:
Fax 020 7414 8099
DX:
312 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC2
Email:
Web:
www.pumptax.com

Richard Vallat

Tel:
Work 020 7414 8080
Email:
Pump Court Tax Chambers (Chambers of Kevin Prosser QC)

Position

Practises in all areas of revenue law,including advice and planning in the following areas: personal tax, corporate taxes, VAT and other indirect taxes, SDLT and tax-related litigation including professional negligence; he also advises on a range of matters both in contemplation of and seeking to avoid litigation, including contractual disputes with a tax element. Recent cases include UBS and DB Group Services (Supreme Court), Coulter Trust (Court of Appeal), Donaldson (Court of Appeal), Greene King (Court of Appeal), Aspect Capital (Upper Tribunal), Perrin & Ardmore Construction (Upper Tribunal), Henderson Investments (First-tier Tribunal), CIFF (High Court), Salinger (Firs-tier Tribunal) and OCO Ltd (First-tier Tribunal).

Career

Called 1997; Gray’s Inn. Attorney General’s B Panel counsel 2011. Attorney General's A Panel counsel June 2016.

Member

Revenue Bar Association; London Common Law and Commercial Bar Association; Chancery Bar Association; Stamp Taxes Practitioners Group; Moderator of the Trusts Discussion Forum; Society of Trust & Estates Practicioners.

Education

Winchester College; Merton College, Oxford; City University; Open University.


London Bar

Private client: personal tax

Within: 2018 Silks

Richard Vallat QC - Pump Court Tax ChambersPersonable, pragmatic and finds solutions.

[back to top]

Tax: corporate and VAT/indirect tax

Within: Tax: VAT - 2018 silks

Richard Vallat QC - Pump Court Tax ChambersHe has immense clarity of thinking and presents a clear and succinct legal analysis, which is also practical and pragmatic.

Within: Tax: corporate - 2018 Silks

Richard Vallat QC - Pump Court Tax ChambersHe has immense clarity of thinking and presents a clear and succinct legal analysis, which is also practical and pragmatic.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.